Oh great. David Lynch.
Bollocks on for far too long.
With a capuchin.
Oh great. David Lynch.
Oh great. David Lynch.
Bollocks on for far too long.
With a capuchin.
Yorke and Anderson’s
Long-form music video
Out now on Netflix.
Unless you’re 100% informed about Cambridge Analytica, you really need to watch this film. It covers a lot of what is already known to those who followed the Facebook-Cambridge-Analytica scandal at the time, as covered in The Guardian by Carole Cadwalladr in her whistle-blowing article “The Great British Brexit Robbery”.
Cadwalladr is interviewed here, along with Cambridge Analytica’s ex-director Brittany Kaiser and ex-employee of Cambridge Analytica Christopher Wylie. Kaiser does her best to paint a sympathetic picture of herself, though I struggled to forget that she was at the heart of everything that happened (thanks to the reminders in the film). As a source, Wylie’s credibility is questioned, though he features lightly. It is an example of how well the film does at keeping the viewpoint as balanced as possible.
Importantly, the film doesn’t end trying to imply that the earth-shattering revelations brought about by the Cambridge Analytica scandal have been resolved. The implications of this scandal and the continued work that seems to be going on at so many of the large technology companies feels like it’s getting worse by the day.
It’s a slightly disjointed film that, at times, doesn’t know what it wants to do with the subject matter. It may have been better-served as a four-part series, focusing on each of the subjects for an hour. The story of the New York media professor David Carroll and his hunt for his own personal information is probably the most interesting but isn’t mentioned for a long portion of the film.
I’d also like to see more prodding of current or ex-Facebook employees, who are clearly implicated in the accusations but continue to avoid the spotlight.
Regardless of its shortcomings, this is an important film to watch. It’s also one you might need to see quickly in case it unexpectedly disappears from Netflix. It might well be the most disturbing horror film of the year.
In 1998, in the run-up to the end of the millennium, the American Film Institute (AFI) published a list of their top 100 films of all time. It counted down the best of English-language American cinema (including those heavily-funded by American production companies), with Citizen Kane topping the list.
In 2007, an updated poll was published, with the Orson Welles masterpiece again topping the bill.
In 2018, a new podcast called ‘Unspooled’ was started by Paul Scheer and Amy Nicholson on the Earwolf network. The brilliant podcast involves Paul and Amy doing a deep dive on each of the films, often bringing along special guests and always offering a personal take on what they’ve seen. It’s a perfect way to educate yourself on critically-acclaimed films. I myself have recently discovered The Marx Brothers thanks to the podcast covering Duck Soup, and looked at The Wizard of Oz with completely fresh eyes.
It’s available to download from all good podcast distributors by searching for “Unspooled”
Where can I watch the Top 100 films?
If, like me, you’re in the UK, it’s useful to know what films are available on each of the three most popular streaming platforms: Netflix, Amazon Prime and Sky Cinema/NOW.
So, here’s a table of what is in the list and where you can watch the films as of 26th December 2018. Note: some films may be purchased from Amazon to stream or from Sky Box Office; the table only notes those included for free in your package.
|Rank||10th anniversary list (2007)||Netflix||Amazon Prime||Sky Cinema|
|5||Singin’ in the Rain||No||No||Yes|
|6||Gone with the Wind||No||Yes||Yes|
|7||Lawrence of Arabia||No||No||Yes|
|10||The Wizard of Oz||No||Yes||No|
|15||2001: A Space Odyssey||No||No||Yes|
|19||On the Waterfront||No||No||No|
|20||It’s a Wonderful Life||No||No||Yes|
|22||Some Like It Hot||Yes||No||Yes|
|23||The Grapes of Wrath||No||No||No|
|24||E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial||No||Yes||Yes|
|25||To Kill a Mockingbird||No||No||Yes|
|26||Mr. Smith Goes to Washington||No||No||No|
|28||All About Eve||No||No||Yes|
|31||The Maltese Falcon||No||No||Yes|
|32||The Godfather Part II||No||No||Yes|
|33||One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest||No||No||Yes|
|34||Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs||No||No||Yes|
|36||The Bridge on the River Kwai||No||No||Yes|
|37||The Best Years of Our Lives||No||No||No|
|38||The Treasure of the Sierra Madre||No||No||No|
|40||The Sound of Music||No||No||Yes|
|42||Bonnie and Clyde||No||No||No|
|44||The Philadelphia Story||No||No||Yes|
|46||It Happened One Night||No||No||No|
|47||A Streetcar Named Desire||No||Yes||Yes|
|50||The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring||Yes||Yes||No|
|51||West Side Story||No||No||Yes|
|53||The Deer Hunter||No||Yes||Yes|
|55||North by Northwest||No||No||Yes|
|58||The Gold Rush||No||No||No|
|65||The African Queen||No||No||No|
|66||Raiders of the Lost Ark||No||No||Yes|
|67||Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?||No||No||Yes|
|70||A Clockwork Orange||No||No||Yes|
|71||Saving Private Ryan||No||No||Yes|
|72||The Shawshank Redemption||No||Yes||No|
|73||Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid||No||No||Yes|
|74||The Silence of the Lambs||No||No||Yes|
|75||In the Heat of the Night||No||No||Yes|
|77||All the President’s Men||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|79||The Wild Bunch||No||No||Yes|
|82||Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans||No||No||No|
|85||A Night at the Opera||No||No||No|
|87||12 Angry Men||No||No||No|
|88||Bringing Up Baby||No||No||No|
|89||The Sixth Sense||No||No||Yes|
|93||The French Connection||No||No||Yes|
|95||The Last Picture Show||No||Yes||Yes|
|96||Do the Right Thing||No||No||Yes|
|98||Yankee Doodle Dandy||No||No||No|
The conclusion? If you want to watch all the films on a subscription-package, your best option for maximum coverage is Sky Cinema. This is a pain because it’s the only one I don’t actually have! With 70 of the top 100, buying a couple of months of Now TV Cinema to clear the ones you’re keen to see would really make an impact. Netflix has just 10 of the films and Amazon has 13. 26 films are not available on any streaming platform, so you’ll need to fork out extra to enjoy those on DVD or Blu-ray.
Note – the list above is subject to change without notice, so please be aware that this is only up-to-date as of 26th December 2018.
The Mowgli you love.
Only much darker, less fun.
And largely pointless.
‘Shirkers’ is a quite remarkable documentary film. Written and directed by Sandi Tan, it tells the story of a potentially groundbreaking film created in 1992 by a group of three teenage girls in Singapore, the reels of which went missing shortly after filming wrapped, disappearing along with the enigmatic director.
Tan was one of the three young aspiring filmmakers behind the film. Her interviews with fellow creators Jasmine Ng and Sophie Siddique, both interviewed here and clearly heartbroken over their loss, reveal a truly enthralling mystery surrounding the film.
The director, Georges Cardona, is a name unfamiliar to most. It is unlikely that he was the man that inspired James Spader’s character in ‘Sex, Lies and Videotapes’, but Cardona wouldn’t let that get in the way of a good story. The picture painted of him here is one of a man full of lies. It’s a man desperate to succeed himself and not let anyone else around him get anywhere without him. There’s also a hint of inappropriate behaviour here – why was a married 40-something-year-old man going on a road trip across the USA with an 18-year-old girl?
As it all unfolds, it’s obvious how frustrating it is for all those involved. This was an exciting passion project that was already picking up a bit of buzz around the industry, which never saw the light of day. Had it been released, it could have had a huge impact on the Singapore film industry and the lives of those behind it.
Sadly, all we can see is the soundless footage and a remorseful memory of three young friends that lost a part of their youth, along with their friendship itself (in a recent interview with Vulture, Tan stated that the Sundance premiere was the first time her, Jasmine and Sophie were all in the same room together in over twenty years).
‘Shirkers’ is a must-see for any young aspiring filmmakers. Actually, it’s a must-see for everyone at all interested in films.
Andy Serkis’s take on ‘The Jungle Book’ is a waste of time and money. There, I’ve said it. It’s not awful. It’s not offensive. It’s just not brilliant. And as such, it’s not necessary.
This is a much darker take than more familiar adaptations, in keeping to the original Rudyard Kipling stories. This leaves it in no-man’s-land, not suitable enough for children but too boring to be enjoyable for adults.
We’re treading familiar ground here. It’s the tale of Mowgli (the impressive Rohan Chand), who is taken on by a pack of wolves after becoming orphaned in a horrific opening scene involving Shere Khan (Benedict Cumberbatch). There’s some character development as he learns how to live in the jungle with his animal friends, including black panther Bagheera (Christian Bale) and sloth bear Baloo (Andy Serkis, sounding like he’s about to offer you the latest Bet 365 betting odds). Cate Blanchett features sporadically and inconsequentially as Kaa, the Indian rock python.
What really doesn’t work is the facial motion capture. It makes the animals look odd and is a distraction from the story. I’m not an expert. All I know is that it doesn’t work.
The interesting part of the film comes when Mowgli arrives in the local village and starts to learn to become more human, which is something explored much less in other adaptations. It’s not amazing, but it does at least do something fresh with the material, and it results in a fresh climax to the story (particularly when Mowgli discovers a distastefully familiar menagerie).
It’s just a film that doesn’t make any sense in terms of why it was released. If the budget was anything like Disney’s live action adaptation, it was $175m. It’s a big loss to take for any studio, even one of the size of Warner Bros.
Watching this on Netflix is watching something designed for a big cinematic experience in a manner that feels like a compromise. If no previous film adaptation existed, it would maybe feel effective. As it stands, it’s just a poor business decision to plough on to complete this project in the knowledge you’ll finish second – both in speed of release and final quality.
The only singing vultures present here will be the critics.
A failure in almost every sense.